-->

« Scott Irvine | Main | The Center of our Galaxy »

What is science good for?

Seems like for the current administration space science basically has two main reasons: "Bush's new space policy had a partly political genesis, with presidential advisers saying that it emerged from a White House search for a bold goal that would help unify the nation before Bush's reelection race and portray him as visionary. [...] Officials said the lunar and Mars program will have a military component, noting that the Pentagon will be consulted and may help with launches." (full story) So astronomical research is basically only good if it helps to detract from a miserable presidency and to get the military into space?

Not that this is any news. Scientists have for decades said that manned space stations orbiting Earth are a waste of money as the research you get out of them is pretty much negligible. But here we are, building a space station....

Disclaimer: I'm an astrophysicist.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 15, 2004 5:22 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Scott Irvine.

The next post in this blog is The Center of our Galaxy.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35