I recently came across Keira Knightley's portrait on the cover of "Interview" magazine (find an interview and some photos, incl. the cover, here), and I was amazed that someone would put such a horrible photo on the cover of a magazine. What were they thinking? My wife loves the site Go Fug Yourself, and over there, they had a fairly accurate description of that look: "a moderately depressed topless mime-clown".
Comments (1)
Better "When Editing Goes Horribly Wrong"
The photographer can take any picture they want - someone else still decides if it shown on the cover.
Posted by rondiorio
|
December 7, 2007 12:12 PM
Posted on December 7, 2007 12:12